NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE

2000 PLAYOFF POWER-PLAY TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)

  1   Detroit                   10 goals in  44 power--play advantages =   22.73 % 
  2   Philadelphia              15 goals in  69 power--play advantages =   21.74 % 
  3   St Louis                   8 goals in  39 power--play advantages =   20.51 % 
  4   Colorado                  15 goals in  85 power--play advantages =   17.65 % 
  5   New Jersey                12 goals in  70 power--play advantages =   17.14 % 
  6   Buffalo                    3 goals in  18 power--play advantages =   16.67 % 
  7   Dallas                    15 goals in  93 power--play advantages =   16.13 % 
  8   San Jose                  10 goals in  63 power--play advantages =   15.87 % 
  9   Phoenix                    3 goals in  19 power--play advantages =   15.79 % 
 10   Pittsburgh                 8 goals in  56 power--play advantages =   14.29 % 
 11   Washington                 3 goals in  21 power--play advantages =   14.29 % 
 12   Edmonton                   3 goals in  25 power--play advantages =   12.00 % 
 13   Ottawa                     2 goals in  22 power--play advantages =    9.09 % 
 14   Florida                    1 goals in  14 power--play advantages =    7.14 % 
 15   Toronto                    2 goals in  43 power--play advantages =    4.65 % 
 16   Los Angeles                0 goals in  24 power--play advantages =    0.00 % 

2000 PLAYOFF PENALTY-KILLING TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)

  1   New Jersey                 5 goals in  67 shorthanded situations =    7.46 % 
  2   Edmonton                   2 goals in  26 shorthanded situations =    7.69 % 
  3   Ottawa                     2 goals in  23 shorthanded situations =    8.70 % 
  4   Detroit                    5 goals in  50 shorthanded situations =   10.00 % 
  5   Dallas                    12 goals in 102 shorthanded situations =   11.76 % 
  6   Florida                    2 goals in  16 shorthanded situations =   12.50 % 
  7   Philadelphia               8 goals in  58 shorthanded situations =   13.79 % 
  8   Toronto                    7 goals in  47 shorthanded situations =   14.89 % 
  9   Pittsburgh                 7 goals in  45 shorthanded situations =   15.56 % 
 10   St Louis                   6 goals in  35 shorthanded situations =   17.14 % 
 11   Colorado                  12 goals in  68 shorthanded situations =   17.65 % 
 12   Washington                 6 goals in  29 shorthanded situations =   20.69 % 
 13   San Jose                  13 goals in  61 shorthanded situations =   21.31 % 
 14   Phoenix                    7 goals in  26 shorthanded situations =   26.92 % 
 15   Los Angeles                7 goals in  24 shorthanded situations =   29.17 % 
 16   Buffalo                    9 goals in  28 shorthanded situations =   32.14 %