1 Detroit 9 goals in 27 power--play advantages = 33.33 % 2 Washington 7 goals in 22 power--play advantages = 31.82 % 3 Vancouver 4 goals in 16 power--play advantages = 25.00 % 4 Toronto 9 goals in 39 power--play advantages = 23.08 % 5 Philadelphia 4 goals in 18 power--play advantages = 22.22 % 6 Buffalo 10 goals in 50 power--play advantages = 20.00 % 7 Colorado 23 goals in 116 power--play advantages = 19.83 % 8 Pittsburgh 11 goals in 61 power--play advantages = 18.03 % 9 Edmonton 5 goals in 31 power--play advantages = 16.13 % 10 New Jersey 16 goals in 101 power--play advantages = 15.84 % 11 St Louis 9 goals in 61 power--play advantages = 14.75 % 12 Los Angeles 6 goals in 50 power--play advantages = 12.00 % 13 Dallas 5 goals in 43 power--play advantages = 11.63 % 14 Carolina 3 goals in 29 power--play advantages = 10.34 % 15 Ottawa 0 goals in 16 power--play advantages = 0.00 % 16 San Jose 0 goals in 23 power--play advantages = 0.00 %
1 Carolina 2 goals in 24 shorthanded situations = 8.33 % 2 St Louis 8 goals in 65 shorthanded situations = 12.31 % 3 Toronto 6 goals in 48 shorthanded situations = 12.50 % 4 Dallas 6 goals in 47 shorthanded situations = 12.77 % 5 Colorado 13 goals in 92 shorthanded situations = 14.13 % 6 Detroit 3 goals in 20 shorthanded situations = 15.00 % 7 Edmonton 4 goals in 26 shorthanded situations = 15.38 % 8 New Jersey 17 goals in 104 shorthanded situations = 16.35 % 9 Buffalo 8 goals in 42 shorthanded situations = 19.05 % 10 San Jose 5 goals in 26 shorthanded situations = 19.23 % 11 Pittsburgh 16 goals in 73 shorthanded situations = 21.92 % 12 Los Angeles 14 goals in 63 shorthanded situations = 22.22 % 13 Ottawa 3 goals in 13 shorthanded situations = 23.08 % 14 Washington 5 goals in 21 shorthanded situations = 23.81 % 15 Vancouver 5 goals in 19 shorthanded situations = 26.32 % 16 Philadelphia 6 goals in 18 shorthanded situations = 33.33 %
Richard Crowe (rcrowe@hubble.uhh.hawaii.edu)