NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE

2001 PLAYOFF POWER-PLAY TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)


This document has been accessed 321 times since 14:00 HST on April 9, 2001.
  1   Detroit                    9 goals in  27 power--play advantages =   33.33 % 
  2   Washington                 7 goals in  22 power--play advantages =   31.82 % 
  3   Vancouver                  4 goals in  16 power--play advantages =   25.00 % 
  4   Toronto                    9 goals in  39 power--play advantages =   23.08 % 
  5   Philadelphia               4 goals in  18 power--play advantages =   22.22 % 
  6   Buffalo                   10 goals in  50 power--play advantages =   20.00 % 
  7   Colorado                  23 goals in 116 power--play advantages =   19.83 % 
  8   Pittsburgh                11 goals in  61 power--play advantages =   18.03 % 
  9   Edmonton                   5 goals in  31 power--play advantages =   16.13 % 
 10   New Jersey                16 goals in 101 power--play advantages =   15.84 % 
 11   St Louis                   9 goals in  61 power--play advantages =   14.75 % 
 12   Los Angeles                6 goals in  50 power--play advantages =   12.00 % 
 13   Dallas                     5 goals in  43 power--play advantages =   11.63 % 
 14   Carolina                   3 goals in  29 power--play advantages =   10.34 % 
 15   Ottawa                     0 goals in  16 power--play advantages =    0.00 % 
 16   San Jose                   0 goals in  23 power--play advantages =    0.00 % 

2001 PLAYOFF PENALTY-KILLING TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)


This document has been accessed 322 times since 14:00 HST on April 9, 2001.
  1   Carolina                   2 goals in  24 shorthanded situations =    8.33 % 
  2   St Louis                   8 goals in  65 shorthanded situations =   12.31 % 
  3   Toronto                    6 goals in  48 shorthanded situations =   12.50 % 
  4   Dallas                     6 goals in  47 shorthanded situations =   12.77 % 
  5   Colorado                  13 goals in  92 shorthanded situations =   14.13 % 
  6   Detroit                    3 goals in  20 shorthanded situations =   15.00 % 
  7   Edmonton                   4 goals in  26 shorthanded situations =   15.38 % 
  8   New Jersey                17 goals in 104 shorthanded situations =   16.35 % 
  9   Buffalo                    8 goals in  42 shorthanded situations =   19.05 % 
 10   San Jose                   5 goals in  26 shorthanded situations =   19.23 % 
 11   Pittsburgh                16 goals in  73 shorthanded situations =   21.92 % 
 12   Los Angeles               14 goals in  63 shorthanded situations =   22.22 % 
 13   Ottawa                     3 goals in  13 shorthanded situations =   23.08 % 
 14   Washington                 5 goals in  21 shorthanded situations =   23.81 % 
 15   Vancouver                  5 goals in  19 shorthanded situations =   26.32 % 
 16   Philadelphia               6 goals in  18 shorthanded situations =   33.33 % 

Richard Crowe (rcrowe@hubble.uhh.hawaii.edu)
Date: 06/10/01 , Time: 19:23:53 H.S.T.