NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE

2004 PLAYOFF POWER-PLAY TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)


This document has been accessed 175 times since 1:00 HST on April 6, 2004.
  1   Tampa Bay                 21 goals in 100 power--play advantages =   21.00 % 
  2   Vancouver                  8 goals in  39 power--play advantages =   20.51 % 
  3   Colorado                   9 goals in  48 power--play advantages =   18.75 % 
  4   Dallas                     4 goals in  22 power--play advantages =   18.18 % 
  5   New Jersey                 3 goals in  18 power--play advantages =   16.67 % 
  6   Calgary                   15 goals in 108 power--play advantages =   13.89 % 
  7   San Jose                  11 goals in  81 power--play advantages =   13.58 % 
  8   Philadelphia               8 goals in  61 power--play advantages =   13.11 % 
  9   Montreal                   5 goals in  40 power--play advantages =   12.50 % 
 10   NY Islanders               2 goals in  16 power--play advantages =   12.50 % 
 11   Toronto                    6 goals in  59 power--play advantages =   10.17 % 
 12   Detroit                    5 goals in  50 power--play advantages =   10.00 % 
 13   Ottawa                     3 goals in  35 power--play advantages =    8.57 % 
 14   Boston                     2 goals in  25 power--play advantages =    8.00 % 
 15   St Louis                   1 goals in  22 power--play advantages =    4.55 % 
 16   Nashville                  1 goals in  29 power--play advantages =    3.45 % 

2004 PLAYOFF PENALTY-KILLING TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)


This document has been accessed 176 times since 1:00 HST on April 6, 2004.
  1   Detroit                    2 goals in  50 shorthanded situations =    4.00 % 
  2   Nashville                  2 goals in  27 shorthanded situations =    7.41 % 
  3   San Jose                   6 goals in  72 shorthanded situations =    8.33 % 
  4   NY Islanders               2 goals in  23 shorthanded situations =    8.70 % 
  5   St Louis                   3 goals in  31 shorthanded situations =    9.68 % 
  6   Boston                     3 goals in  30 shorthanded situations =   10.00 % 
  7   Toronto                    6 goals in  58 shorthanded situations =   10.34 % 
  8   Montreal                   5 goals in  42 shorthanded situations =   11.90 % 
  9   Ottawa                     4 goals in  32 shorthanded situations =   12.50 % 
 10   Tampa Bay                 11 goals in  76 shorthanded situations =   14.47 % 
 11   Vancouver                  6 goals in  40 shorthanded situations =   15.00 % 
 12   Calgary                   21 goals in 121 shorthanded situations =   17.36 % 
 13   Colorado                   9 goals in  47 shorthanded situations =   19.15 % 
 14   Philadelphia              14 goals in  71 shorthanded situations =   19.72 % 
 15   Dallas                     6 goals in  21 shorthanded situations =   28.57 % 
 16   New Jersey                 4 goals in  12 shorthanded situations =   33.33 % 

Richard Crowe (rcrowe@hubble.uhh.hawaii.edu)
Date: 06/07/04 , Time: 21:00:45 H.S.T.