1 NY Rangers 13 goals in 46 power--play advantages = 28.26 % 2 New Jersey 18 goals in 71 power--play advantages = 25.35 % 3 Detroit 22 goals in 89 power--play advantages = 24.72 % 4 Calgary 7 goals in 31 power--play advantages = 22.58 % 5 Vancouver 12 goals in 56 power--play advantages = 21.43 % 6 San Jose 9 goals in 46 power--play advantages = 19.57 % 7 Toronto 7 goals in 36 power--play advantages = 19.44 % 8 Pittsburgh 10 goals in 54 power--play advantages = 18.52 % 9 Washington 6 goals in 40 power--play advantages = 15.00 % 10 Chicago 9 goals in 67 power--play advantages = 13.43 % 11 St Louis 6 goals in 45 power--play advantages = 13.33 % 12 Philadelphia 9 goals in 70 power--play advantages = 12.86 % 13 Buffalo 3 goals in 26 power--play advantages = 11.54 % 14 Dallas 3 goals in 26 power--play advantages = 11.54 % 15 Boston 2 goals in 20 power--play advantages = 10.00 % 16 Quebec 2 goals in 25 power--play advantages = 8.00 %
1 Toronto 2 goals in 27 shorthanded situations = 7.41 % 2 NY Rangers 5 goals in 50 shorthanded situations = 10.00 % 3 Buffalo 3 goals in 26 shorthanded situations = 11.54 % 4 Vancouver 8 goals in 66 shorthanded situations = 12.12 % 5 New Jersey 10 goals in 74 shorthanded situations = 13.51 % 6 Chicago 11 goals in 76 shorthanded situations = 14.47 % 7 Pittsburgh 10 goals in 57 shorthanded situations = 17.54 % 8 Detroit 14 goals in 77 shorthanded situations = 18.18 % 9 Calgary 6 goals in 29 shorthanded situations = 20.69 % 10 Philadelphia 15 goals in 65 shorthanded situations = 23.08 % 11 Washington 9 goals in 38 shorthanded situations = 23.68 % 12 Quebec 7 goals in 29 shorthanded situations = 24.14 % 13 St Louis 11 goals in 42 shorthanded situations = 26.19 % 14 San Jose 13 goals in 45 shorthanded situations = 28.89 % 15 Boston 5 goals in 17 shorthanded situations = 29.41 % 16 Dallas 9 goals in 30 shorthanded situations = 30.00 %
This document has been accessed 997 times since 10:00 HST on September 18, 1995.
Richard Crowe (rcrowe@hubble.uhh.hawaii.edu)