NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE

1995 PLAYOFF POWER-PLAY TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)


  1   NY Rangers                13 goals in  46 power--play advantages =   28.26 % 
  2   New Jersey                18 goals in  71 power--play advantages =   25.35 % 
  3   Detroit                   22 goals in  89 power--play advantages =   24.72 % 
  4   Calgary                    7 goals in  31 power--play advantages =   22.58 % 
  5   Vancouver                 12 goals in  56 power--play advantages =   21.43 % 
  6   San Jose                   9 goals in  46 power--play advantages =   19.57 % 
  7   Toronto                    7 goals in  36 power--play advantages =   19.44 % 
  8   Pittsburgh                10 goals in  54 power--play advantages =   18.52 % 
  9   Washington                 6 goals in  40 power--play advantages =   15.00 % 
 10   Chicago                    9 goals in  67 power--play advantages =   13.43 % 
 11   St Louis                   6 goals in  45 power--play advantages =   13.33 % 
 12   Philadelphia               9 goals in  70 power--play advantages =   12.86 % 
 13   Buffalo                    3 goals in  26 power--play advantages =   11.54 % 
 14   Dallas                     3 goals in  26 power--play advantages =   11.54 % 
 15   Boston                     2 goals in  20 power--play advantages =   10.00 % 
 16   Quebec                     2 goals in  25 power--play advantages =    8.00 % 

1995 PLAYOFF PENALTY-KILLING TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)


  1   Toronto                    2 goals in  27 shorthanded situations =    7.41 % 
  2   NY Rangers                 5 goals in  50 shorthanded situations =   10.00 % 
  3   Buffalo                    3 goals in  26 shorthanded situations =   11.54 % 
  4   Vancouver                  8 goals in  66 shorthanded situations =   12.12 % 
  5   New Jersey                10 goals in  74 shorthanded situations =   13.51 % 
  6   Chicago                   11 goals in  76 shorthanded situations =   14.47 % 
  7   Pittsburgh                10 goals in  57 shorthanded situations =   17.54 % 
  8   Detroit                   14 goals in  77 shorthanded situations =   18.18 % 
  9   Calgary                    6 goals in  29 shorthanded situations =   20.69 % 
 10   Philadelphia              15 goals in  65 shorthanded situations =   23.08 % 
 11   Washington                 9 goals in  38 shorthanded situations =   23.68 % 
 12   Quebec                     7 goals in  29 shorthanded situations =   24.14 % 
 13   St Louis                  11 goals in  42 shorthanded situations =   26.19 % 
 14   San Jose                  13 goals in  45 shorthanded situations =   28.89 % 
 15   Boston                     5 goals in  17 shorthanded situations =   29.41 % 
 16   Dallas                     9 goals in  30 shorthanded situations =   30.00 % 

This document has been accessed 997 times since 10:00 HST on September 18, 1995.

Richard Crowe (rcrowe@hubble.uhh.hawaii.edu)
Date: 06/25/95 , Time: 00:38:36 H.S.T.