NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE

1996 PLAYOFF POWER-PLAY TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)

  1   Boston                     7 goals in  27 power--play advantages =   25.93 % 
  2   Toronto                    8 goals in  32 power--play advantages =   25.00 % 
  3   Colorado                  24 goals in 111 power--play advantages =   21.62 % 
  4   NY Rangers                12 goals in  56 power--play advantages =   21.43 % 
  5   Philadelphia              15 goals in  71 power--play advantages =   21.13 % 
  6   Vancouver                  7 goals in  39 power--play advantages =   17.95 % 
  7   Washington                 7 goals in  39 power--play advantages =   17.95 % 
  8   Detroit                   20 goals in 112 power--play advantages =   17.86 % 
  9   Pittsburgh                16 goals in 100 power--play advantages =   16.00 % 
 10   St Louis                  11 goals in  69 power--play advantages =   15.94 % 
 11   Chicago                    7 goals in  46 power--play advantages =   15.22 % 
 12   Florida                   14 goals in 109 power--play advantages =   12.84 % 
 13   Montreal                   3 goals in  31 power--play advantages =    9.68 % 
 14   Tampa Bay                  3 goals in  35 power--play advantages =    8.57 % 
 15   Calgary                    0 goals in  22 power--play advantages =    0.00 % 
 16   Winnipeg                   0 goals in  28 power--play advantages =    0.00 % 

1996 PLAYOFF PENALTY-KILLING TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)

  1   Chicago                    5 goals in  54 shorthanded situations =    9.26 % 
  2   Philadelphia               7 goals in  63 shorthanded situations =   11.11 % 
  3   NY Rangers                 8 goals in  57 shorthanded situations =   14.04 % 
  4   Pittsburgh                14 goals in  96 shorthanded situations =   14.58 % 
  5   Detroit                   13 goals in  89 shorthanded situations =   14.61 % 
  6   Toronto                    5 goals in  34 shorthanded situations =   14.71 % 
  7   Colorado                  17 goals in 114 shorthanded situations =   14.91 % 
  8   Boston                     5 goals in  30 shorthanded situations =   16.67 % 
  9   Washington                 7 goals in  42 shorthanded situations =   16.67 % 
 10   Calgary                    4 goals in  21 shorthanded situations =   19.05 % 
 11   Florida                   20 goals in 103 shorthanded situations =   19.42 % 
 12   St Louis                  15 goals in  74 shorthanded situations =   20.27 % 
 13   Vancouver                  8 goals in  37 shorthanded situations =   21.62 % 
 14   Winnipeg                   8 goals in  37 shorthanded situations =   21.62 % 
 15   Tampa Bay                 10 goals in  43 shorthanded situations =   23.26 % 
 16   Montreal                   8 goals in  33 shorthanded situations =   24.24 % 

This document has been accessed 803 times since 16:00 HST on June 11, 1996.