1 Anaheim 10 goals in 39 power--play advantages = 25.64 % 2 Florida 6 goals in 25 power--play advantages = 24.00 % 3 Colorado 21 goals in 95 power--play advantages = 22.11 % 4 New Jersey 11 goals in 50 power--play advantages = 22.00 % 5 Ottawa 7 goals in 35 power--play advantages = 20.00 % 6 Philadelphia 18 goals in 94 power--play advantages = 19.15 % 7 Pittsburgh 4 goals in 23 power--play advantages = 17.39 % 8 NY Rangers 10 goals in 62 power--play advantages = 16.13 % 9 Buffalo 8 goals in 53 power--play advantages = 15.09 % 10 Detroit 17 goals in 116 power--play advantages = 14.66 % 11 Edmonton 8 goals in 55 power--play advantages = 14.55 % 12 St Louis 5 goals in 37 power--play advantages = 13.51 % 13 Phoenix 3 goals in 26 power--play advantages = 11.54 % 14 Dallas 3 goals in 40 power--play advantages = 7.50 % 15 Chicago 1 goals in 26 power--play advantages = 3.85 % 16 Montreal 0 goals in 16 power--play advantages = 0.00 %
1 Ottawa 2 goals in 27 shorthanded situations = 7.41 % 2 New Jersey 3 goals in 36 shorthanded situations = 8.33 % 3 Colorado 7 goals in 84 shorthanded situations = 8.33 % 4 Florida 2 goals in 21 shorthanded situations = 9.52 % 5 Anaheim 6 goals in 45 shorthanded situations = 13.33 % 6 Pittsburgh 4 goals in 29 shorthanded situations = 13.79 % 7 St Louis 6 goals in 42 shorthanded situations = 14.29 % 8 Detroit 15 goals in 96 shorthanded situations = 15.62 % 9 Edmonton 10 goals in 61 shorthanded situations = 16.39 % 10 Dallas 6 goals in 34 shorthanded situations = 17.65 % 11 Buffalo 11 goals in 60 shorthanded situations = 18.33 % 12 NY Rangers 14 goals in 68 shorthanded situations = 20.59 % 13 Phoenix 6 goals in 28 shorthanded situations = 21.43 % 14 Philadelphia 19 goals in 88 shorthanded situations = 21.59 % 15 Chicago 12 goals in 45 shorthanded situations = 26.67 % 16 Montreal 9 goals in 28 shorthanded situations = 32.14 %
This document has been accessed 723 times since 9:00 HST on June 4, 1997.
Richard Crowe (rcrowe@hubble.uhh.hawaii.edu)