NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE

1998 PLAYOFF POWER-PLAY TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)

  1   Phoenix                    6 goals in  33 power--play advantages =   18.18 % 
  2   Buffalo                   16 goals in  90 power--play advantages =   17.78 % 
  3   St Louis                  13 goals in  75 power--play advantages =   17.33 % 
  4   San Jose                   6 goals in  35 power--play advantages =   17.14 % 
  5   Washington                14 goals in  85 power--play advantages =   16.47 % 
  6   Detroit                   20 goals in 127 power--play advantages =   15.75 % 
  7   Ottawa                     8 goals in  51 power--play advantages =   15.69 % 
  8   Boston                     6 goals in  40 power--play advantages =   15.00 % 
  9   Colorado                   5 goals in  35 power--play advantages =   14.29 % 
 10   New Jersey                 3 goals in  23 power--play advantages =   13.04 % 
 11   Pittsburgh                 4 goals in  33 power--play advantages =   12.12 % 
 12   Montreal                   6 goals in  50 power--play advantages =   12.00 % 
 13   Edmonton                   8 goals in  72 power--play advantages =   11.11 % 
 14   Dallas                    10 goals in 100 power--play advantages =   10.00 % 
 15   Philadelphia               3 goals in  35 power--play advantages =    8.57 % 
 16   Los Angeles                1 goals in  29 power--play advantages =    3.45 % 

1998 PLAYOFF PENALTY-KILLING TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)

  1   Buffalo                    9 goals in  89 shorthanded situations =   10.11 % 
  2   St Louis                   7 goals in  69 shorthanded situations =   10.14 % 
  3   Edmonton                   7 goals in  67 shorthanded situations =   10.45 % 
  4   Detroit                   14 goals in 119 shorthanded situations =   11.76 % 
  5   Dallas                    11 goals in  92 shorthanded situations =   11.96 % 
  6   Washington                15 goals in 115 shorthanded situations =   13.04 % 
  7   Boston                     3 goals in  20 shorthanded situations =   15.00 % 
  8   Colorado                   7 goals in  46 shorthanded situations =   15.22 % 
  9   Montreal                   9 goals in  58 shorthanded situations =   15.52 % 
 10   New Jersey                 4 goals in  25 shorthanded situations =   16.00 % 
 11   Ottawa                     7 goals in  40 shorthanded situations =   17.50 % 
 12   Phoenix                    7 goals in  40 shorthanded situations =   17.50 % 
 13   San Jose                   7 goals in  38 shorthanded situations =   18.42 % 
 14   Pittsburgh                 5 goals in  27 shorthanded situations =   18.52 % 
 15   Los Angeles                8 goals in  36 shorthanded situations =   22.22 % 
 16   Philadelphia               9 goals in  32 shorthanded situations =   28.12 %