NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE

1999 PLAYOFF POWER-PLAY TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)


This document has been accessed 1182 times since 18:00 HST on April 21, 1999.
  1   Detroit                   14 goals in  59 power--play advantages =   23.73 % 
  2   Buffalo                   19 goals in  95 power--play advantages =   20.00 % 
  3   Anaheim                    4 goals in  20 power--play advantages =   20.00 % 
  4   New Jersey                 5 goals in  27 power--play advantages =   18.52 % 
  5   St Louis                  11 goals in  61 power--play advantages =   18.03 % 
  6   Pittsburgh                 8 goals in  45 power--play advantages =   17.78 % 
  7   San Jose                   7 goals in  40 power--play advantages =   17.50 % 
  8   Boston                     9 goals in  59 power--play advantages =   15.25 % 
  9   Colorado                  14 goals in  96 power--play advantages =   14.58 % 
 10   Toronto                   12 goals in  87 power--play advantages =   13.79 % 
 11   Phoenix                    5 goals in  41 power--play advantages =   12.20 % 
 12   Dallas                    13 goals in 107 power--play advantages =   12.15 % 
 13   Edmonton                   2 goals in  17 power--play advantages =   11.76 % 
 14   Ottawa                     3 goals in  27 power--play advantages =   11.11 % 
 15   Philadelphia               3 goals in  27 power--play advantages =   11.11 % 
 16   Carolina                   2 goals in  21 power--play advantages =    9.52 % 

1999 PLAYOFF PENALTY-KILLING TEAM RANKINGS

(from best to worst)


This document has been accessed 1183 times since 18:00 HST on April 21, 1999.
  1   Edmonton                   2 goals in  22 shorthanded situations =    9.09 % 
  2   Dallas                     9 goals in  95 shorthanded situations =    9.47 % 
  3   St Louis                   8 goals in  71 shorthanded situations =   11.27 % 
  4   Pittsburgh                 6 goals in  50 shorthanded situations =   12.00 % 
  5   Buffalo                   17 goals in 118 shorthanded situations =   14.41 % 
  6   Philadelphia               5 goals in  34 shorthanded situations =   14.71 % 
  7   New Jersey                 4 goals in  26 shorthanded situations =   15.38 % 
  8   Carolina                   4 goals in  24 shorthanded situations =   16.67 % 
  9   San Jose                   7 goals in  42 shorthanded situations =   16.67 % 
 10   Boston                     8 goals in  47 shorthanded situations =   17.02 % 
 11   Detroit                    9 goals in  50 shorthanded situations =   18.00 % 
 12   Colorado                  19 goals in 105 shorthanded situations =   18.10 % 
 13   Toronto                   13 goals in  71 shorthanded situations =   18.31 % 
 14   Ottawa                     4 goals in  18 shorthanded situations =   22.22 % 
 15   Phoenix                    9 goals in  33 shorthanded situations =   27.27 % 
 16   Anaheim                    7 goals in  23 shorthanded situations =   30.43 % 

Richard Crowe (rcrowe@hubble.uhh.hawaii.edu)
Date: 06/19/99 , Time: 23:45:23 H.S.T.