1 Detroit 14 goals in 59 power--play advantages = 23.73 % 2 Buffalo 19 goals in 95 power--play advantages = 20.00 % 3 Anaheim 4 goals in 20 power--play advantages = 20.00 % 4 New Jersey 5 goals in 27 power--play advantages = 18.52 % 5 St Louis 11 goals in 61 power--play advantages = 18.03 % 6 Pittsburgh 8 goals in 45 power--play advantages = 17.78 % 7 San Jose 7 goals in 40 power--play advantages = 17.50 % 8 Boston 9 goals in 59 power--play advantages = 15.25 % 9 Colorado 14 goals in 96 power--play advantages = 14.58 % 10 Toronto 12 goals in 87 power--play advantages = 13.79 % 11 Phoenix 5 goals in 41 power--play advantages = 12.20 % 12 Dallas 13 goals in 107 power--play advantages = 12.15 % 13 Edmonton 2 goals in 17 power--play advantages = 11.76 % 14 Ottawa 3 goals in 27 power--play advantages = 11.11 % 15 Philadelphia 3 goals in 27 power--play advantages = 11.11 % 16 Carolina 2 goals in 21 power--play advantages = 9.52 %
1 Edmonton 2 goals in 22 shorthanded situations = 9.09 % 2 Dallas 9 goals in 95 shorthanded situations = 9.47 % 3 St Louis 8 goals in 71 shorthanded situations = 11.27 % 4 Pittsburgh 6 goals in 50 shorthanded situations = 12.00 % 5 Buffalo 17 goals in 118 shorthanded situations = 14.41 % 6 Philadelphia 5 goals in 34 shorthanded situations = 14.71 % 7 New Jersey 4 goals in 26 shorthanded situations = 15.38 % 8 Carolina 4 goals in 24 shorthanded situations = 16.67 % 9 San Jose 7 goals in 42 shorthanded situations = 16.67 % 10 Boston 8 goals in 47 shorthanded situations = 17.02 % 11 Detroit 9 goals in 50 shorthanded situations = 18.00 % 12 Colorado 19 goals in 105 shorthanded situations = 18.10 % 13 Toronto 13 goals in 71 shorthanded situations = 18.31 % 14 Ottawa 4 goals in 18 shorthanded situations = 22.22 % 15 Phoenix 9 goals in 33 shorthanded situations = 27.27 % 16 Anaheim 7 goals in 23 shorthanded situations = 30.43 %
Richard Crowe (rcrowe@hubble.uhh.hawaii.edu)